The Miracle Maker is the most recent film I've discussed so far, but one of my top ten Jesus films. The five other recordings are still available to download from the podcast. They are Jesus of Nazareth, Il Vangelo Secondo Matteo (The Gospel According to St. Matthew), The Greatest Story Ever Told, Jesus of Montreal and Jesus Christ, Superstar.
Monday, April 30, 2007
Podcast: The Miracle Maker
The Miracle Maker is the most recent film I've discussed so far, but one of my top ten Jesus films. The five other recordings are still available to download from the podcast. They are Jesus of Nazareth, Il Vangelo Secondo Matteo (The Gospel According to St. Matthew), The Greatest Story Ever Told, Jesus of Montreal and Jesus Christ, Superstar.
Friday, April 27, 2007
The Silver Chalice

Despite Newman dubbing it "the worst film of the fifties", I recently decided to ignore his advice and get hold of a copy.
Technically The Silver Chalice isn't a bible film at all. It doesn't even contain enough incident from the New Testament to class as a Jesus Cameo film such as Ben Hur or The Robe. It was, however, clearly inspired by (perhaps the financial success of) that latter film. Both productions are sword and sandal epics based on successful novels about a young man becoming a Christian as a result of his pursuit of an early Christian relic. In this case, rather than the robe of Jesus, it is the cup from the Last Supper, and rather than trying to destroy the relic, Basil (Newman) is actually trying to protect it.

Aside from the usual Roman-Christian-film plot of pagan-finds-faith falling for beautiful-Christian-girl, the film also features a couple of notable sub-plots. Basil's travels are supposedly driven by his quest to find the third witness to his adoption (after the other two attempt to disinherit him), but the story fizzles out as the film progresses. Likewise, when Basil is reunited with his childhood sweetheart Helena (Virginia Mayo) a love-triangle plot begins to emerge, but again, it's never really followed through.
However, worse than this is the way in which the writers seem to just abandon the main plot. Basil's commission to craft a chalice to protect the holy cup is set against the efforts of Simon the Magician's quest to destroy it. Their respective tasks take them both to Rome, home of Simon Peter.

It will be restored, but for years and for hundreds of years, it will lie in darkness. Where I know not.This is probably the worst piece of dialogue ever recorded in a bible film, and that is up against some pretty tough competition. It's a terrible, ill-considered manner in which to end the film, managing to leave the audience feeling cheated even despite the very poor quality of the film up to that point.
When it is brought out into the light again there will be great cities, and mighty bridges and towers higher than the tower of Babel it will be a world of evil and long bitter wars. In such a world as that the little cup will look very lonely.
But it may be in that age when man holds lightning in his hands and rides the sky as Simon the Magician strove to do it will be needed more than it is needed now.

The events of the last supper are also recounted. There are also fleeting appearances by Luke, Nero and Joseph of Arimathea, who is the grandfather of Basil's love interest Deborra (Pier Angelini).
At least some of the criticisms of the film are unfair. For all Newman's self-deprecating remarks about his performance it's not that bad – although certainly not up to the standard of his work elsewhere. The sets are also often criticised, but they actually have a certain charm. Unlike most roman epics this one does not occur in palaces and temples. The drabness of the sets is, in some ways, fitting, and there are a few interesting choices from time to time.
Finally there are some agreeable moments in Franz Waxman's score. Whilst it doesn't compare to the score he wrote for Rear Window earlier that same year, it's certainly one of the strongest aspects of the film.
So all in all, Ed Wood fans can rest easy. Silver Chalice doesn't quite live up to its hype.
1 – This has also been attributed to the Hollywood Reporter, Variety and just the "trade ads" in general".
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
The Church Times - Fifty Top Religious Films

It's a really good list, with much in common with the Arts and Faith Top 100. As always there are a few surprises including the omission of Dreyer's Ordet and anything by Kieslowski's or Ozu, but it's great to see a list that is prepared to cover the full history and geography of cinema rather than limit itself to Hollywood films from the last 30 years. That said I'm really pleased to see Field of Dreams come in at number 23. That film has never made it onto the Arts and Faith list, despite (or perhaps because of) my lobbying on its behalf. What is also surprising is the inclusion of a number of church made films such as The Prodigal (1983).

As expected, there are a number of Bible Films on the list:
2. The Gospel According to St Matthew
4. The Last Temptation of Christ
9. The Passion of the Christ
15. Jesus of Montreal
27. The Greatest Story Ever Told
28. The Prince of Egypt
33. The Ten Commandments
34. Jesus Christ, Superstar
40. King of Kings
43. Samson and Delilah

All in all though, I can highly recommended this particular list, and it's nicely laid out in the PDF version of the file. Worth printing out for future reference at any rate. (Thanks to Gareth Higgins for posting this at his blog).
Monday, April 23, 2007
Series Summary: UK Living Bible

The history of this series is a little complicated, and I'm grateful for the comments WitlessD made on one of the earlier previous posts on this subject which sum things up as well as anywhere I have found. The episodes included here are a selection from the original series which apparently consisted of 26 fifteen minute episodes. The films were originally released on 16mm film. Then in 1982 these were edited and shown on US TV as 12 half hour episodes. I'll be covering this release at some point in the future. The re-release merged episodes and used different titles and so on.
The UK DVD release returns to the original films and offers them in their original format. On the downside this does mean the quality is fairly poor. This is only to be expected though. The films were relatively rare and at no point does this claim to be a remastered or restored print. It does mean, however, that they come in their original format. They are the same length and have the same introductions and titles as that series. As the starts and ends of episodes are often narrated this is fairly significant.

1. Birth of the Savior (2)The numbers in brackets represent the number of that episode in the original series. It's apparent, then, that this release has it's episodes in a muddle. In some places this is fairly insignificant (e.g. the order of episodes 6 and 7 where one is unique to John and the other based on the synoptics). However in places the discrepancy is so glaring it seems amazing that it has been missed. For example, Jesus's appearance before the high priest after is betrayal in Gethsemane, or his ascension after his resurrection.
2. Childhood of Jesus (3)
3. Thirty Pieces of Silver (18)
4. Jesus and the Lepers (15)
5. First Disciples (5)
6. Jesus at Nazareth and Capernaum (7)
7. Woman at the Well (6)
8. Jesus Before the High Priest (21)
9. Betrayal in Gethsemane (20)
10. Trial Before Pilate (22)
11. The Lord's Ascension (26)
12. The Lord is Risen! (25)

Another issue which impinges on Leigh's performance is the overall quality of filmmaking. These are clearly low budget films and the writing is fairly unimaginative, making only a small amount of effort to understand the events and the characters it depicts. It's also a very literal rendering. Whilst it's happy to vary some of the dialogue (usually for brevity), it rarely offers incidents not recorded in scripture.

Elsewhere the acting is more uneven. Some performances are decent enough; others are hilariously poor. The actors are not helped by having to cover their heads with what certainly appear to have been tea towels, nor does the overall lack of character development in the script give them much to work with. Even so, most of the performances either fall flat or are over acted.
In a funny way this reflects the more visual aspects of the film. Generally, the compositions are uninspired, and the camera work is fairly static. Occasionally however, something a bit out of the ordinary is tried, perhaps a special effect. When they do, however they feel forced and awkward, particularly by today's standards.
Friday, April 20, 2007
Update on my other writing
Film Review: Rocky BalboaTomb Raiders - A look at the Jesus Tomb Controversy
Film Review: Amazing GraceMy Sweet Lord - Some thoughts about the Chocolate Jesus sculpture
The Follower - Review similar to my review here about these 3 short films.
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
The Guardian on Archer's "Gospel of Judas"

Quite why anyone would still take Jeffrey Archer seriously is beyond me, even if he is writing with a Professor. It's even possible that Archer's book is inadvertently discrediting the whole "Gospel of Judas" story far more effectively than the host of biblical scholars who have tried to do likewise by tackling it head on.
(And yes, I know that one is a lost gospel whilst the other is a work of fiction cashing in on it, but still )
Monday, April 16, 2007
Golgotha on DVD
I discovered last week that Julien Duvivier's Golgotha is now available on VHS and DVD from French site PrinceMinister.
The site is in French so I have no idea whether there are any subtitles, how reliable the company is, whether they post abroad, and if the DVD has any extras, but I imagine the DVD is Region 2 and the video will be SECAM.
An English dubbed version is available on VHS (NTSC) from US company Hollywood's Attic.
Friday, April 13, 2007
Jesus Film Postponed After Coke Complain

However, what really caused controversy, was the scene where the man offers Jesus a drink of Coke. Despite at least one Vatican insider seeming happy with it (Krystov Zanussi was part of a film festival jury that actually approved it), the soft drinks firm baulked at the inclusion of their product. They requested the scene be cut, and so the release of 7km was delayed at short notice in order to make the relevant cuts.
The film is based on an Italian book also called "7km from Jerusalem", and stars soap star Luca Ward and Rosalinda Celentano (Satan in The Passion of the Christ)
Story also covered by Cinnematical.
Thursday, April 12, 2007
Book Review: Religion and Film: An Introduction - Melanie J. Wright

Secondly, much analysis is overly dependent on narrative, and contains little discussion about the visual aspects of the films being considered. "Could it be that – despite the growing bibliography and plethora of courses - film is not really being studied at all?"1
In addition to these criticisms, Wright also notes that analysis has been too unfocussed. The choice of films examined by these books has tended to be driven by what appeals to the author, rather than a consensus about which films are particularly significant.
Finally, this has been exaggerated by a failure to take into consideration a film's reception, by both critics and audiences.

The rest of the book deals with 6 films that are specifically about religion (as opposed to alluding to faith or religion in passing or in some symbolic way). Devoting a chapter to each, then, Wright tackles La Passion de Jeanne d'Arc (Christianity), The Ten Commandments (Judaism and Christianity), The Wicker Man (Paganism), My Son the Fanatic (Islam), Keeping the Faith (Christianity and Judaism), and Lagaan (Hinduism).
In addition to covering a number of major religions, the films selected also enable Wright to expand on particular aspects of the four areas listed above. For example, the chapter on The Wicker Man (1973) is particularly concerned with the way in which the film's reception shaped the film itself. Initially unpopular it was heavily cut, but gaining cult status has allowed fuller versions to be released on DVD.

On top of this, the author also comments on the condescending manner that many film critics take to such "spectacle" films. This idea is expanded in chapter VII (Keeping the Faith) which looks at the way popular films are often ignored by film commentators simply because of their popularity. From a cultural studies point of view this is a mistake.
In a slightly different vein, chapter VIII (Lagaan) discusses the Hindu concept of darsan - "experiencing the presence of the divine through the act of seeing a god or saint".4 This offers a very different religious perspective to much western analysis where artists such as Dreyer and Schrader consider transcendence to be related to austerity.

The emphases on viewer activity and the idea that film can be religion itself are most welcome. Whilst this thesis is, of itself, interesting, it also evokes the T.S. Eliot quote "The end of our exploring will be to arrive at where we started, and to know the place for the first time". One suspects many faith and film commentators have known this deep down but have been unable to articulate it. Thankfully Melanie Wright has done so.
Notes 1 - p.22 2 – p.30 3 – p.29 4 – p.151 | 5 – p.169 6 – p.170 7 – p.172 8 – p.172 |
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
Scene Guide - Jesus Christ, Superstar

0:00:00 - OvertureNotes
0:05:30 - Heaven on Their Minds
0:09:00 - What's the Buzz? - (Matt 6:34; John 14:1; Luke 10:38-42)
0:11:30 - Strange Things Mystifying - (John 12:3-7)
0:13:30 - Then We Are Decided - (John 11:47-48)
0:17:00 - Everything's Alright - (Luke 8:1-3; Matt 6:34; Mark 14:3-9)
0:21:30 - This Jesus Must Die - (Mark 14:1-2; John 11:49-50)
1:25:30 - Hosanna - (Mark 11:1-10)
0:28:00 - Simon Zealotes - (John 6:15)
1:32:30 - Poor Jerusalem - (Mark 10:45)
0:34:15 - Pilate's Dream - (Matt 27:19)
0:36:00 - The Temple - (Mark 11:15-19)
0:39:00 - Gethsemane/See my eyes - (Mark 1:32-34; Luke 11:29)
0:42:30 - I Don't Know How to Love Him
0:46:30 - Damned for All Time / Blood Money - (Mark 14:10-11)
0:51:30 - The Last Supper - (Mark 14:17-31)
0:58:00 - Gethsemane (I Only Want to Say) - (Mark 14:32-42)
1:04:30 - What's the buzz (reprise) - (Mark 14:43-50)
1:06:15 - The Arrest - (Mark 15:1)
1:08:15 - Peter's Denial - (Mark 14:66-72)
1:11:00 - Pilate & Christ - (Mark 15:2-5; Luke 23:6-7)
1:13:00 - King Herod Song - (Luke 23:8-11)
1:16:45 - Could We Start Again, Please? - (Matt 16:22)
1:20:00 - Judas's Death - (Matt 27:3-5)
1:24:30 - Trial Before Pilate - (John 18:29-38, 19:4-16; Matt 27:24,26)
1:31:30 - Superstar
1:36:00 - Crucifixion - (Mark 15:22-27,34; Luke 23:34, 46)
1:38:45 - John Nineteen: Forty-One - (John 19:40-41)
1:41:15 - [Empty Cross] - (John 10:11-15)
The film's use of the biblical sources is particularly interesting. As is fairly standard for a Jesus film, the various gospels are harmonised into one telling. Since the libretto holds fairly loosely to the texts this is generally unproblematic, but one exception is the scene where Pilate condemns Jesus - Trial Before Pilate. This draws on John 18:29-38, as well as 19:4-16 and two verses from the gospel of Matthew 27:24,26. This song seems a little overcomplicated as it seeks to explain why Pilate condemned Jesus. It's the one aspect that the 1999 recording of the stage version of the opera does particularly well - explaining why the brutal Pilate we find recorded in history appears to act meekly in the case of Jesus.

Whilst I've expanded the list of references here there are more I could have included. One of the useful sources in constructing the above information is Stern, Jefford and Debona's "Savior on the Silver Screen". There they include a few verses that I did not, such as the use of Mark 16:8 to refer to the actors getting on the coach in the silence at the end of the film. This hasn't been included mainly because this scene is outside of the historical referencing of the play, and those verse refer to different characters both in person and in function.

Friday, April 6, 2007
Easter TV in the UK
Good Friday
TCM - 17:10
Ben-Hur
The spectacular chariot race is just one of the highlights of this magnificent epic, graced by vast sets, Charlton Heston, and a compelling story. D: William Wyler (1959) - Preceded by short documentary.
BBC1 - 17:35
Prince of Egypt
Animted film of the Moses story.
Holy Saturday
TCM - 02:55
The Prodigal
Lana Turner plays the sultry temptress who lures a wealthy man into wicked ways in this sumptuous re-telling of the biblical story of The Prodigal Son. D: Richard Thorpe (1955)
Easter Sunday
Channel 4 - 21:00
Secrets of the Dead: Shroud of Christ
Could the Shroud of Turin really be 2,000 years old? And, if so, does it contain the image of Christ?
Channel 4 - 22:00
The Passion of The Christ
(2004) Mel Gibson's Oscar-nominated film is a dramatic, haunting and visceral telling of Christ's final hours and crucifixion, with James Caviezel as Jesus.
300 Review

It's not too long before it's clear that the advertisers have invested their money wisely. The opening scenes show the future King Leonidas as a young boy. As he is dragged away to begin his military training, his mother wails in despair. Her appearance is important, as she is the only woman in the film who will manage to keep her shirt on. Like Sin City before it, the men are men and the women are fantasised sex objects.

One of the film's main strengths is sheer energy. As noted above, portentous speeches are all part of the territory, but all too often epic movies get bogged down in them. Here they are used to give the viewer a break from the action, but nobody takes them that seriously. Leonidas yells "no going back", or "freedom", someone gives him the option to surrender, he refuses and it's onto the next fight. The battle scenes are surprisingly short, and punctuating them with these oases of rhetoric gives the film a natural and engaging rhythm.
The emphasis on "freedom" as opposed to religious ideas means 300 is much more Gladiator than Kingdom of Heaven and more Braveheart than Passion of the Christ. In fact, it's particularly reminiscent of Braveheart: a divided group of tribes threatened by a dominant southern nation, talk of, fight for and die for freedom. Ultimately, the heroes are betrayed and deserted, but after their deaths their example and inspires others to fight again and win, despite being outnumbered. Even King Leonidas (played by Phantom of the Opera's Gerard Butler) retains his Scottish accent.
Braveheart, of course, was the film that breathed new life into the epic, and 300 follows suit. The 12 years since Gibson modernised the genre may not seem like a long time, but changes have been so dramatic in commercial cinema that it needed modernising again. 300 is not the first epic to try to use CGI, but it is the one that has realised it has far more potential than simply making things even bigger.

When critics talked about The Nativity Story killing the epic they clearly lacked Snyder's vision. It's true that dull, pompous or overly melodramatic movies will struggle in the epic genre just as they should in any other genre. But, the energy and the look of 300 have set a new standard in epic films.
It's too bad that the ambitious artistry is not matched with similarly innovative themes and ideas. 300 is entertainment, impure and simple. As such it is content to give the audience what it wants without challenging them in any way. It seems to be working too. In it's opening weekend 300 broke US box office records for March, and has performed well overseas. Unfortunately, what this audience bears little similarity with the real world. Life is not simply a mix of testosterone and adrenaline. Those who head off to fight wars dreaming of glory have often found that far from being glorious, death is cruel, brutal, messy and desperate.
Snyder has of course denied that the film should be read in the light of current events, but as 300 is so heavily dependent on Miller's comic book it's largely out of his hands. Whilst it may not have been his intention, he is unable to see past the fact that he shares a common mindset with those who wage war in the name of their freedom. In their world, fighting is valiant and brave. When conflict arises real men take up arms and fight.

It's a disturbing sub-text, which, like Sin City before it, appeals to men's basest instincts and twisted fantasies. It's a pity, because it will be revisited in years to come as the film that re-booted the epic.
Wednesday, April 4, 2007
Living Bible - Episodes 11 & 12 (UK version)
Episode 11 -The Lord's Ascension
Recap
Jesus meets two women - (Matt 28:8-10)
Road to Emmaus - (Luke 24:13-33)
Appearance to disciples - (John 20:19-23)
Doubting Thomas - (John 20:24-29)
Beach - (John 21:8-17)
Great commission - (Matt 28:16-20)
Ascension - (Acts 1:3-11)
Episode 12 - The Lord is Risen
Joseph asks for Jesus's body - (Mark 15:42-45)
Burial - (John 19:38-42, Mark 15:46-47))
Request to Seal the Tomb - (Matt 27:62-66)
Resurrection - (Matt 28:2-4)
Pharisees bribe the soldiers - (Matt 28:11-15)
Women Outside the tomb - (Mark 16:1-4)
Women Inside the tomb - (Mark 16:5-8)
Magdalene tells Peter and John - (John 20:2)
Peter and John at the tomb - (John 20:3-10)
Magdalene sees angels - (John 20:11-13)
Magdalene sees Jesus - (John 20:14-18)
These final two episodes reveal similar faults to previous entries, namely that they are the wrong way around. Hence we have the Ascension before the Resurrection. However, taken together, and in the correct order, they do provide the most thorough treatment of the events following Jesus's death committed to film. Even other long treatments of Jesus's life such as Jesus of Nazareth and the Living Christ Series offer only a selection of the events recorded in the gospels. The only other film that really comes close is The Miracle Maker.
One of the reasons that filmmakers generally pick and choose which events to include is that it is very hard to fit them all together. Indeed in a number of places there either seem to be contradictions or the only feasible harmonisation sounds completely implausible. For example, here we have Jesus and his followers making trips all over the place, in particular the trip to Galilee and back would take a considerable portion of the 40 days from Jesus's resurrection to his ascension.
The script is fairly clever though in the way it depicts the women at the tomb arriving. It has to gloss over a couple of apparent inconsistencies (such as precisely which women were at the tomb and when), but by having Mary the mother of James, Salome and Mary Magdalene go to the tomb first (Mark), they are able to have Mary Magdalene go and tell Peter and John (John) whilst the others go inside (Matt). It does overlook that fact that Matthew has Magdalene not Salome go inside, and that Luke mentions that Joanna witnessed these events, but generally it holds up rather well.
Finally, the portrayals of the Romans and the priests is problematic here. When Joseph approached Pilate to ask for Jesus's body he is in credibly reasonable about it, and is concerned that he might offend Joseph if it appears he is questioning his honesty in seeking for verification of Jesus's death. By contrast the story of the priests bribing the soldiers paints them in a very poor light and they continue to hound Pilate.
I'll be offering some reflections on this DVD set as a whole shortly.
Tuesday, April 3, 2007
Biblical Studies Carnival XVI

All those things having been said, I think it is unreasonable to expect Jacobovici to have published his case in academic peer-reviewed journals. As he has repeatedly insisted, he is a journalist and a filmmaker and not an academic. It is notoriously difficult for non-professional academics to make it into a peer reviewed journal, all the more so if the case one has might be seen as imaginative or speculative. To turn it around, how often do we academics first publish our results by means of television documentary? If a filmmaker were to complain about our not having gone first to television, we would rightly point out that our access to that medium is limited and that we do not have the requisite expertise and experience to go through that portal.I think there are things to be learned by the various blogging academics, one or two were so keen to jump in while the water was hot that they got their feet burned a little. But it's all part of an important learning process. This certainly won't be the last time that a story like this needs a quick response.
I was pleased that Watson also gave credit to James Tabor for keeping the dialogue going. I don't particularly agree with a lot of what he says, but it is good to see him facing up to the challenges that are being thrown up to his case. Watson has also awarded Tabor the title of "Blogger of the Month".
Next month's Biblical Studies Carnival XVII will be hosted by Christopher Heard of Higgaion.
Monday, April 2, 2007
Latest News on Christ the Lord

For what it's worth, the next instalment in Rice's series of novels, "Christ the Lord: The Road to Cana" is due out next spring.
(Hat tip to Peter Chattaway)